By Published on

Username first, password second - for security, usability, infrastructure efficiency

Have you noticed the new trend: when logging in web applications we are first prompted for username and then, on another form, for password? That is, one at a time, first name, then password.

Why's that? Is it considered a defensive control against automated attacks? Will it break some of our existing routines?

This is a real and intentional shift in authentication UX, and yes—it is partly a defensive security control, but not only that. The “username first, password second” flow exists at the intersection of security, usability, and infrastructure efficiency.

1. Defense against automated attacks (indirectly)

a) Reduces credential-stuffing efficiency

Credential-stuffing bots work best when they can submit username + password together and immediately learn whether the combo is valid.

Splitting the flow:

  • forces bots to maintain state across requests,
  • adds extra round trips,
  • makes large-scale automation more fragile and slower,
  • enables earlier bot detection (before password entry).

This doesn’t stop bots, but it raises cost and lowers success rates.

b) Enables earlier rate limiting

Once a username/email is entered:

  • the system can apply per-account throttling,
  • detect abnormal patterns (many attempts against one account),
  • lock or slow attempts before passwords are tried.

This protects the password verification backend, which is usually more sensitive.

2. Enables smarter authentication decisions

This is one of the biggest reasons.

After the username is known, the system can decide:

  • does this account require:

    • SSO?
    • MFA?
    • hardware keys?
    • CAPTCHA?

  • Is the account:

    • disabled?
    • managed by an enterprise identity management?
    • passwordless?

Example

If you enter joe.doe@company.com, the system might:

  • redirect to Microsoft Entra ID / Okta / Keycloak,
  • skip password entirely,
  • ask for a security key instead.

This is impossible without knowing the identity first.

3. Improves MFA and adaptive authentication

Modern systems use risk-based authentication.

Once the username is known, the system can evaluate:

  • login location,
  • device fingerprint,
  • past behavior,
  • IP reputation.

Then decide:

  • password only,
  • password + MFA,
  • passwordless challenge,
  • block immediately.

This makes authentication context-aware, not static.

4. Limits information leakage (ironically)

At first glance, it seems worse—because the system can say:

“That account doesn’t exist”

But in practice:

  • well-designed systems respond ambiguously,
  • enumeration protection is applied at the username stage,
  • password errors don’t reveal additional info.

Separating steps lets systems apply different error semantics safely.

5. Performance and architectural benefits

Password verification:

  • uses slow hashing (bcrypt, argon2, scrypt),
  • is CPU-expensive by design.

By splitting the flow:

  • the system avoids expensive hash checks for obviously invalid cases,
  • infrastructure can scale better under attack,
  • password verification happens only when truly necessary.

This is especially valuable during credential-stuffing storms.

6. UX and password managers (surprisingly)

This pattern also helps:

  • autofill reliability,
  • account selection when multiple logins exist,
  • cleaner mobile UX.

It’s one of the few cases where security and usability align.

7. Is it a strong defensive control by itself?

Not really, it is more like:

a speed retarder, not a wall

It works best when combined with:

  • rate limiting,
  • bot detection,
  • MFA,
  • breach password detection,
  • WebAuthn / passkeys.

On its own, it won’t stop a determined attacker.

We have also mentioned that this approach can break the existing mechanisms, like password managers failing to fill in credentials - as they only see one field instead of two.

This is true but vendors do not wait, they have already improved detection algorithms and adapted workflows. By 2026, most (e.g., 1Password, Bitwarden) use advanced heuristics, session tracking, or browser extensions that monitor multi-page flows and autofill across steps.